Alexander Peterson is an individual associated with a state-registered broker-dealer. His primary responsibilities include soliciting institutional clients for purchases of U.S. Treasury bonds and facilitating private placement offerings of corporate bonds, ensuring all sales meet federal and state transaction exemptions. He receives transaction-based compensation for these activities. Under the Uniform Securities Act, Alexander Peterson is most likely considered:
A.An agent, because he represents a broker-dealer in effecting or attempting to effect purchases or sales of securities.
B.Not an agent, because he only deals in securities and transactions that are exempt from registration under the Uniform Securities Act.
C.Not an agent, because his activities are limited to institutional clients, which are often exempt from certain registration requirements.
D.Not an agent, because his advisory role with institutional clients does not involve direct execution of trades.
Rationale:
Under the Uniform Securities Act (USA), an individual representing a broker-dealer in effecting or attempting to effect purchases or sales of securities is defined as an agent and must register. This holds true regardless of whether the securities themselves (like U.S. Treasury bonds) or the transactions (like private placements) are exempt from registration. The exemptions for securities and transactions apply to the securities or transactions themselves, or to individuals representing *issuers* under specific conditions, but they do not exempt an individual representing a *broker-dealer* from agent registration.
The idea of him not being an agent because he deals exclusively in exempt securities and exempt transactions is incorrect because these exemptions do not extend to individuals representing broker-dealers. Such exemptions are typically relevant for agent registration when an individual represents an *issuer*.
The idea of him not being an agent because his activities are limited to institutional clients is incorrect. While certain offerings or transactions might have exemptions related to institutional investors, an individual representing a broker-dealer and soliciting sales to these clients is still performing an agent function under the USA.
The idea of him not being an agent because his advisory role does not involve direct execution of trades is incorrect. Alexander's role involves 'soliciting' and 'facilitating' purchases and offerings, which unequivocally falls under 'effecting or attempting to effect purchases or sales' of securities, the core definition of an agent, even if he is not directly inputting the final trade orders.
100% Free
Free FINRA Series 63 Questions + Study Tips
Join FINRA Series 63 candidates receiving practice questions and expert exam-day strategies directly to their inbox.