Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and the Bank Secrecy Act
Heather Patel, a new client, opens a variable annuity with a lump sum of $50,000 via a wire transfer from a known regional bank. Three weeks later, she calls her registered representative, indicating she wants to add another $7,500 to her annuity. She arrives at the office with five separate money orders, each for $1,500, purchased from different convenience stores. When asked about the source, she states, 'Just some cash I had from various odd jobs, trying to keep things simple.' Her explanation feels rehearsed, and she avoids eye contact. Given this scenario, what is the registered representative's most appropriate immediate action regarding the additional $7,500 contribution?
A.Accept the funds, document the details of the transaction and the client's explanation, and promptly escalate the situation by filing an internal suspicious activity report with the firm's Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Compliance Officer.
B.Decline to accept the funds, explaining to Heather Patel that the firm has policies against accepting multiple money orders for substantial sums without clear source documentation.
C.Proceed with accepting the funds and documenting the transaction, as the total amount is below the $10,000 threshold for Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs) and money orders are not considered cash.
D.Advise Heather Patel that the transaction structure is unusual and suggests she combine the funds into a single cashier's check or wire transfer to avoid scrutiny.
Rationale:
The registered representative's primary obligation under AML rules is to identify and report suspicious activity, regardless of whether a Currency Transaction Report (CTR) threshold ($10,000 in cash) is met. The scenario presents several 'red flags' for potential money laundering: the use of multiple money orders (a common structuring technique to avoid reporting), the vague and rehearsed explanation for the source of funds, and the client's nervous demeanor. These indicators warrant the filing of a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR). The correct procedure is to accept the funds (to avoid 'tipping off' the client) and immediately report the suspicious activity internally to the firm's AML Compliance Officer, who will then determine if a SAR needs to be filed with FinCEN.
Declining the funds without reporting is incorrect because the immediate regulatory obligation is to report suspicious activity, and refusing the transaction outright could tip off the client, hindering potential investigations.
Proceeding with the transaction simply because the amount is below the CTR threshold and the instruments are money orders is a common misunderstanding. SARs are triggered by suspicious activity, even for amounts over $5,000, or any amount if certain red flags are present, and apply to various financial instruments, not just cash. Structuring transactions below reporting thresholds is a key indicator of suspicious activity.
Advising the client about the unusual nature of the transaction or suggesting alternative funding methods to 'avoid scrutiny' constitutes 'tipping off,' which is a severe violation of AML regulations. Representatives are strictly prohibited from informing clients that their activity is being reported or investigated.
100% Free
Free FINRA Series 6 Questions + Study Tips
Join FINRA Series 6 candidates receiving practice questions and expert exam-day strategies directly to their inbox.
